krytarowski added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29288#660703, @mehdi_amini wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29288#660677, @krytarowski wrote:
>
> > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29288#660636, @clayborg wrote:
> >
> > > Be very careful when using this, you can't change member variables that 
> > > used to be std::once to be statics. We also don't need the llvm namespace 
> > > to be included with "using namespace llvm;" in many of the files.
> >
> >
> > `using namespace llvm;` is currently required in order to get this 
> > functional:
>
>
> What about just updating the macro in LLVM to make it not needed?
>
>   #define LLVM_DEFINE_ONCE_FLAG(flag) static llvm::once_flag flag = 
> Uninitialized
>


Right, this looks cleaner. I will propose this patch as a separated review.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D29288



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to