================
@@ -435,142 +435,202 @@ struct DemanglingPartsTestCase {
DemanglingPartsTestCase g_demangling_parts_test_cases[] = {
// clang-format off
{
"_ZNVKO3BarIN2ns3QuxIiEEE1CIPFi3FooIS_IiES6_EEE6methodIS6_EENS5_IT_SC_E5InnerIiEESD_SD_",
- { /*.BasenameRange=*/{92, 98}, /*.ScopeRange=*/{36, 92},
/*.ArgumentsRange=*/{ 108, 158 },
- /*.QualifiersRange=*/{158, 176}, /*.PrefixRange=*/{0, 0},
/*.SuffixRange=*/{0, 0} },
+ {
+ /*.BasenameRange=*/{92, 98}, /*.TemplateRange=*/{0, 0},
/*.ScopeRange=*/{36, 92},
----------------
Michael137 wrote:
I'm concerned how setting the `TemplateRange` is done outside of the
`TrackingOutputBuffer`. Would it be difficult to track this inside the
demangler?
Also, shouldn't the `CPlusPlusLanguage` plugin be changed to now use the
`TemplateArgumentsRange` to handle the `${function.template-arguments}`
variable?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150999
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
