================
@@ -92,6 +92,10 @@ void TrackingOutputBuffer::finalizeStart() {
if (NameInfo.BasenameRange.second == 0)
NameInfo.BasenameRange.second = getCurrentPosition();
+ if (NameInfo.BasenameRange.second != NameInfo.ArgumentsRange.first)
+ NameInfo.TemplateArgumentsRange = {NameInfo.BasenameRange.second,
+ NameInfo.ArgumentsRange.first};
----------------
charles-zablit wrote:
I agree that this would be much more robust.
I think I've tried that in one of my iterations but this caused some of the
tests to regress. I will post the results of the failing tests in a moment.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150999
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
