JDevlieghere wrote:

> Could you use `kNum_Cores` so we don't have to remember to update this when 
> new ones are added?
> 
> Also the `eCore_wasm32` one has an empty body, so does that mean it does not 
> get checked?

Good catch, that's an unintentional off-by-one. Using `kNum_Cores` addresses 
both.

> And you say 2 cores were in the wrong order but only one is moved in the 
> diff. Maybe the other is a downstream thing?

Haha, I guess it depends on how you (or the diff algorithm) looks at it. 
`thumbv7s` and `thumbv7k` showed up before `thumbv7f` which is why I said 2, 
which of course can be be fixed by moving just `thumbv7f` which is equivalent 
to moving the other two down. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/159452
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to