================
@@ -225,3 +227,63 @@ TEST_F(MemoryTest, TesetMemoryCacheRead) {
// instead of using an
// old cache
}
+
+/// A process class that reads `lower_byte(address)` for each `address` it
+/// reads.
+class DummyReaderProcess : public Process {
+public:
+ size_t DoReadMemory(lldb::addr_t vm_addr, void *buf, size_t size,
+ Status &error) override {
+ uint8_t *buffer = static_cast<uint8_t *>(buf);
+ for (size_t addr = vm_addr; addr < vm_addr + size; addr++)
+ buffer[addr - vm_addr] = addr;
+ return size;
+ }
+ // Boilerplate, nothing interesting below.
+ DummyReaderProcess(lldb::TargetSP target_sp, lldb::ListenerSP listener_sp)
+ : Process(target_sp, listener_sp) {}
+ bool CanDebug(lldb::TargetSP, bool) override { return true; }
+ Status DoDestroy() override { return {}; }
+ void RefreshStateAfterStop() override {}
+ bool DoUpdateThreadList(ThreadList &, ThreadList &) override { return false;
}
+ llvm::StringRef GetPluginName() override { return "Dummy"; }
+};
+
+TEST_F(MemoryTest, TestReadMemoryRanges) {
+ ArchSpec arch("x86_64-apple-macosx-");
+
+ Platform::SetHostPlatform(PlatformRemoteMacOSX::CreateInstance(true, &arch));
+
+ DebuggerSP debugger_sp = Debugger::CreateInstance();
+ ASSERT_TRUE(debugger_sp);
+
+ TargetSP target_sp = CreateTarget(debugger_sp, arch);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(target_sp);
+
+ ListenerSP listener_sp(Listener::MakeListener("dummy"));
+ ProcessSP process_sp =
+ std::make_shared<DummyReaderProcess>(target_sp, listener_sp);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(process_sp);
+
+ DummyProcess *process = static_cast<DummyProcess *>(process_sp.get());
+ process->SetMaxReadSize(1024);
+
+ llvm::SmallVector<uint8_t, 0> buffer(1024, 0);
+
+ // Read 8 ranges of 128 bytes, starting at random addresses
----------------
DavidSpickett wrote:
After reading this, I think I understand. The addresses and sizes you put in
are somewhat arbitrary.
I think I would prefer to see a few "carefully chosen" sequences instead, or as
well. Boundary conditions at least.
This is a relatively simple algorithm to test but if it did fail, I'm not sure
the failure reporting would be good enough to know what inputs it was given.
Maybe GoogleTest will surprise me though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163651
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
