felipepiovezan wrote: Right, that's exactly what I'm trying to say: we can keep the original type and rename the variable instead. The concrete type is still useful for readers to know how it can be used. We don't treat the concrete type as a stack (e.g. we manipulate it in the middle), so having "stack" in the type is very misleading.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/167018 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
