================
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+"""
+Test that pending breakpoints resolve for JITted code with mcjit and rtdyld.
+"""
+
+import lldb
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
+
+
+class TestJitBreakpoint(TestBase):
+ @skipUnlessArch("x86_64")
+ @skipUnlessCompilerIsClang
+ @expectedFailureAll(oslist=["windows"])
+ def test_jit_breakpoints(self):
+ self.build()
+ self.ll = self.getBuildArtifact("jitbp.ll")
+ self.do_test("--jit-kind=mcjit")
+ self.do_test("--jit-linker=rtdyld")
+
+ def do_test(self, jit_flag: str):
+ self.runCmd("settings set plugin.jit-loader.gdb.enable on")
+
+ clang_path = self.findBuiltClang()
+ self.assertTrue(clang_path, "built clang could not be found")
+ lli_path = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(clang_path), "lli")
+ self.assertTrue(lldbutil.is_exe(lli_path), f"'{lli_path}' is not an
executable")
+ self.runCmd(f"target create {lli_path}", CURRENT_EXECUTABLE_SET)
----------------
jimingham wrote:
But if your goal is to have this be in separate pieces in case you need to
instrument it when it mysteriously fails on some bot, maybe doing the separate
stages by hand in the test is okay too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170333
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
