charles-zablit wrote: > The LLDB changes look good to me. I don't know if it's better to land the > LLVM changes separately.
The llvm changes are not justified on their own, as `llvm::Expected<CVType>LazyRandomTypeCollection::getTypeOrError(TypeIndex Index)` would not be used in the patch. I think this can be merged as is! LGTM once the merge conflict is fixed ✅ https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166455 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
