================ @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ #define LLDB_INVALID_PROCESS_ID 0 #define LLDB_INVALID_THREAD_ID 0 #define LLDB_INVALID_FRAME_ID UINT32_MAX +#define LLDB_INVALID_FRAME_LIST_ID 0 ---------------- jimingham wrote:
It seems weird to use 0 as the invalid frame list ID, when you use 0 explicitly as the Unwinder ID. Is there a reason not to use UINT32_MAX? I don't think anyone is likely to want to use that many chained frame providers... https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178823 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
