On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Jim Ingham <jing...@apple.com> wrote: > We've had a couple of cases of "dead" code which turned out to be the > llvm.org side of generic behavior for which Swift was the only current > specific implementation. So while I agree, little single functions that > aren't used anywhere are fine to cull, anything that looks like it might be > the former issue should probably be discussed first. > > Jim >
Ideally functions used for out-of-tree consumers should be properly unit-tested so we can at least have an alarm to distinguish. This doesn't replace a discussion of course, but it's still useful. _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
