felipepiovezan wrote: > If we have an eager breakpoint, and there are any enqueued delayed > breakpoints, send the delayed breakpoints before we process the eager > breakpoint.
Yeah, to me this makes the most sense as well. The whole eager business was a late addition, so it slipped through the cracks, but it is clearly wrong to not flush the cache while doing the eager breakpoint. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/192971 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
