aokblast wrote:
> > with the test limited to FreeBSD.
>
> Is this because it assumes things about the call stack? That `vfprintf` is
> its own function, I think?
>
> If that's so could the test be changed to be two functions we write
> ourselves, and step out of those?
Yes, since step-out is to get the previous caller and we cannot assume
different libc implementations have same call stack.
I also try to create a testcase like the following:
```
void g() {}
void f() {g()}
int main() {f()}
```
and set a breakpoint on g(), step-out twice. It seems that simple program does
not break lldb on FreeBSD.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/195809
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
