satyajanga wrote:
> Address space support in LLDB has been a long-desired feature > (https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-segmented-address-space-support-in-lldb/56714). > There's multiple groups of people interested in this (e.g. Wasm also > requires this) so I think it warrants more visibility through the RFC > process. Feel free to revive the old thread or start a new one. It would be > interesting to compare the proposed approach here with what we had in mind in > the past. Thank you for providing the historic context: Posted the RFC as recommended https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-address-spaces-support-in-lldb/91222 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/206370 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
