jimingham wrote: > Upon thinking about it a bit more, perhaps the whole API strangeness could be > resolved by adding ` CloneWithTypeSynthetic(SBTypeSynthetic)` instead of > `SetTypeSynthetic`? > > The only drawback I see is that we lose the ability to pin a specific VO > instance to a different type in a hierarchy outside of a SCP, but that > doesn't seem like such a big loss.
You could add that but wouldn't it be at base "Clone" followed by "SetTypeSynthetic"? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/209056 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
