Rajveer100 wrote: Indeed, that's exactly what I was trying to do but I ended up with new modules for two reasons:
- I wasn't sure how the current codebase would get affected with this since DWARF6 has some new fields and the existing evaluator is based on DWARF5 (correct me if I am wrong). - I believe DWARF6 is still in draft process, so getting the functionality and logic right first would be better, at least what I thought. We could have a separate CLI invoking command to only trigger the experimental DWARF6 evaluation without disturbing the current one. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/205532 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
