hawkinsw wrote:
> Given that the DWIM-print philosophy is to look up everything it can as a
> simple lookup, and only falling back on the expression evaluator if it has
> to, checking that identifiers are in the persistent expression store before
> falling back to actually running the expression evaluator is the more
> consistent way to do this.
Just curious, but it seems like
```C++
if (frame && try_variable_path) {
VariableSP var_sp;
Status status;
auto valobj_sp = frame->GetValueForVariableExpressionPath(
expr, eval_options.GetUseDynamic(),
StackFrame::eExpressionPathOptionsAllowDirectIVarAccess |
StackFrame::eExpressionPathOptionsDisallowGlobals,
var_sp, status, lldb::eDILModeSimple);
if (valobj_sp && status.Success() && valobj_sp->GetError().Success()) {
```
does an evaluation, although in a limited context where the effect of the
evaluation may be no more powerful than a lookup. Is that consistent with the
"DWIM-print philosophy is to look up everything"? I'm just trying to make sure
that I understand!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/215650
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
