medismailben wrote: > > Interesting timing for you to look at this ... yesterday ran into an issue > > because I was adding a `std::variant` (requires C++ 17) private member in > > one of the SBAPI headers and since `Makefile.rules` hardcodes `-std=c++11` > > for every C++ test driver under `lldb/test/API`, these generated tests that > > include every SBAPI headers were failing. > > I wonder if we should bump the C++ version in the Makefile to 17 to align > > with the rest of llvm or if liblldb needs to work with older C++ compilers. > > I think we should try to keep c++11 compatibility if possible. LLVM and LLDB > have adopted c++17 for implementation but that doesn't mean our users need to > adopt c++17 to use LLDB (IMO).
Yeah I was simply wondering if we had that written down anywhere. I think it would be good to mention at least the oldest compatible version on the website. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/215551 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
