Nerixyz wrote: > You probably already know this, but the effect of saying something might have > a dynamic type is that if asked, lldb will try to determine whether the > dynamic type exists. It's perfectly happy to fail finding a dynamic type for > something that might have been, so it's always better to err on the side of > saying something might have a dynamic type, than saying it isn't.
I'm only marking types dynamic that have a v(f/b)table, because only for those lldb can resolve the dynamic type. As far as I know, that's also what the DWARF AST builder does. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/155853 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
