DavidSpickett wrote:

> Looks like a timeout, so not immediately clear if this is a true-regression 
> or a false-positive due to flakiness due to timeouts.

The latter. In theory any test that waits on another process that it spawns 
could be indefinitely delayed by the OS scheduler, but some of them are hit 
harder than others.

(not blaming the OS, we are running `nproc` tests at once with zero headroom, 
which doesn't help)

I will expand the skip since this test has been a common failure for a while 
now.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/218045
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to