================
@@ -489,6 +497,168 @@ TEST_F(MemoryTest, TestReadStopsAtAnInvalidRange) {
EXPECT_TRUE(process->m_reads.empty());
}
+TEST_F(MemoryTest, TestReadRangesFromCaches) {
+ CacheTestProcess proc;
+ ASSERT_TRUE(proc.process());
+ DummyProcess *process = proc.process();
+ const lldb::addr_t line = proc.line();
+
+ { // A short fetch must expose only the bytes it read, and must not disturb a
+ // range the caches already served.
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
Is this actually true or even tested? Doesn't the short fetch does destroy the
40-byte 0xAA L1 chunk at 0xB000?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/221015
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
