https://github.com/Nerixyz approved this pull request.
> True, but it's still too likely for my liking. I've dealt with other tests > where I added minutes long timeouts and operating systems still managed to > delay it enough. You just end up chasing higher and higher timeouts and I > don't think it's good practice. > And even if it's 0.01% flakes, someone has to look at the flake and decide if > it's real. Well, if we're all good upstanding engineers that is. What's more > likely to happen is it gets disabled again and we're back to zero coverage. This sounds reasonable to me. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/221196 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
