Makes sense. I'll update the diff.

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:28 AM Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote:

> This is definitely required, but only on windows. I’d put it behind a
> check for Windows, and I’d also add a check to print a warning/error if
> (TARGET lld) returns false on windows
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:22 AM Davide Italiano via Phabricator <
> revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> davide added a subscriber: zturner.
>> davide added a comment.
>>
>> Not sure lld is the default? I think I always build with bfd (or gold).
>> I'll check later today when I'm in the office. I'm not against this
>> change per se, but adding another dependency seems annoying. cc: @zturner
>>
>>
>> https://reviews.llvm.org/D39689
>>
>>
>>
>> --
-- 
Stephane Sezer
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to