> On Jan 28, 2018, at 9:59 PM, Davide Italiano <dccitali...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 5:26 PM, Davide Italiano <dccitali...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Jason Molenda via lldb-commits >> <lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> Author: jmolenda >>> Date: Thu Jan 11 17:16:13 2018 >>> New Revision: 322339 >>> >>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=322339&view=rev >>> Log: >>> When parsing the target.xml register file, if no architecture has >>> been specified yet (either by the user, or by one of the lldb >>> extensions like qHostInfo or qProcessInfo), and the target.xml >>> includes a <architecture> tag specifying x86_64, set the architecture >>> appropriately. >>> >>> I'm not sure what we can expect to see in the <architecture> tag, so >>> I'm only doing this for x86_64 right now where I've seen "i386:x86_64" >>> used. I've seen a target.xml from a jtag board that sends just "arm" >>> because it doesn't know more specifically what type of board it is >>> connected to... >>> >>> <rdar://problem/29908970> >>> >> >> Jason, >> is there a way to test this change? >> > > ping? Any news on this front?
Thanks for the reminder. I need to look at doing this - I'm in the middle of another patch right now but I'll return to this after that. _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
