On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Greg Clayton <clayb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 13, 2018, at 10:37 AM, Davide Italiano via lldb-commits
>> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> An alternative proposed by Fred which is an OK middle ground IMHO is
>> that of not inserting a decl for the unmangled name, but treat this
>> symbol always as-it-is.
>> i.e. if we have a symbol _Znwm in some object, we don't insert a decl
>> for `operator new(unsigned long)` but for _Znwm itself.
>> Greg, Jason, would that work for you guys?
> I would be ok with that.
I'm going to send a review for this soon.
lldb-commits mailing list