On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:11 AM Jonas Devlieghere via Phabricator <
revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:

> JDevlieghere added a comment.
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45215#1056917, @zturner wrote:
> > I haven’t had time to look at this in detail yet, but when I originally
> had
> >  this idea I thought we would use lit’s discovery mechanism to find all
> .py
> >  files, and then invoke them using dotest.py in single process mode with
> a
> >  path to a specific file.
> Assuming we can work around the problem of not every `.py` file being a
> test (by filtering the `Test` prefix), would there be a way to
> differentiate the different test within a single file?
Would we need to?  dotest will just run all the tests in a single file.

I can see how it might be desirable as an end state, but not necessarily as
an incremental step.
lldb-commits mailing list

Reply via email to