labath accepted this revision.
labath added inline comments.
================
Comment at: source/Utility/FileSpec.cpp:244-246
+ // Only update style if explicitly requested.
+ if (style)
+ m_style = (*style == Style::native) ? GetNativeStyle() : *style;
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
> labath wrote:
> > I don't really have a clear opinion on whether the new behaviour here is
> > better or not, but it any case this sounds like something worth explicitly
> > calling out.
> As far as the FileSpec class is concerned this doesn't change anything, we
> were always explicitly passing the m_style argument which is now implicit. To
> me this seems strictly better than what is was, were you might accidentally
> end up with the host path.
>
> I'll add a comment in the header.
Yes, but the counterargument to that is: since you're replacing the old
filespec with a completely unrelated path, who's to say that the old path
syntax is any better fit than "host".
I think it would be best here to actually make this argument mandatory and
force everyone to think about the correct syntax when constructing the object,
but maybe that's a change for another day.
================
Comment at: unittests/Utility/FileSpecTest.cpp:284
"//",
- "//a",
"//a/",
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
> labath wrote:
> > Any particular reason for removing this?
> Yup, llvm doesn't consider `C:` or `//net` to be absolute paths (as opposed
> to `C:\` or `//net/`. While this is debatable, it makes things consistent
> with drive names on Windows, which is why I added the net tests above.
Ah, I see.. I can certainly understand why `c:` wouldn't be considered
absolute, but I'm not sure the same thing applies to `//net`. However, I think
I can live that interpretation right now..
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48084
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
