aleksandr.urakov added inline comments.
================
Comment at: source/Plugins/SymbolFile/PDB/PDBASTParser.cpp:291-295
+ if (udt->isConstType())
+ clang_type = clang_type.AddConstModifier();
+
+ if (udt->isVolatileType())
+ clang_type = clang_type.AddVolatileModifier();
----------------
zturner wrote:
> Can you remind me what this means? How would an entire type be marked const
> or volatile? There's no instance variable in play here, these are just types
> as they are declared in the source code, if I'm not mistaken. Something like
> `const class Foo {int x; };` doesn't make any sense. So I'm curious under
> what circumstances these 2 if statements would evaluate to true.
If I understand right, we may find ourselves here during processing of argument
types of some method.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49410
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
