labath added a comment. Wouldn't it be even better to actually expose the llvm class via some accessor or something? This way we could slowly migrate existing code by changing it to write to `stream.accessor()` instead of `stream` ? (I am not saying to do that now, but it opens up possibilities for the future.)
I also found it hard to deduce who is forwarding to whom from the member names. Maybe rename `m_forward_to` to `m_target` or something like that? https://reviews.llvm.org/D50161 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
