clayborg added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D32167#1212783, @jankratochvil wrote:
> Just a ping, that `ConcatenatingDataExtractor` is still not coded, even as > some draft patch? Just checking to prevent duplicating some existing work. > FYI providing a rebase with few simple conflicts resolved > <https://people.redhat.com/jkratoch/lldb-D32167.patch>. I had to drop > conflicting `lldb.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj` changes there. I have stalled on this due to performance. Anything I do will ruin the performance of 99% of the DWARF consumers for .debug_types which is rarely used by our clients. Right now we have one data extractor with only a virtual destructor. https://reviews.llvm.org/D32167 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
