xbolva00 added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53010#1260956, @aprantl wrote:
> Currently `v` is an alias for `version`. I'd wager that — compared to > printing a variable — LLDB user's almost never want to print LLDB's version. > Would it make sense to re-purpose the single-letter `v` abbreviation for the > much more frequently used `frame variable` action? +1 for v as an alias for frame variable. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D53010 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
