labath added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52461#1266302, @aleksandr.urakov wrote:
> `operator<<A>'::`2'::B::operator> > The reason we had to use clang lexer for parsing itanium names is because parsing itanium demangled names is tricky precisely for cases like these. If the MSVC demangler makes these cases trivial by enclosing them in quotes, maybe a separate (simpler) parser is not such a bad idea. However, I still think this should be done within the scope of `CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName` otherwise, you'll have to special case MSVC for all existing uses of this class. Repository: rLLDB LLDB https://reviews.llvm.org/D52461 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
