JDevlieghere added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54059#1286293, @teemperor wrote:
> Minor detail: The revision title only mentions Java, but this revision > removes both Go and Java. Actually, this review is only for removing the Java plugin. There’s a different review for the Go plugin: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54057. I suppose the confusion is the result of the first file removing both enum values. I’ll update the review. > Did anyone actually went through with Jim's proposal and posted this proposal > to some Go mailing list or so? I didn’t but I’m not sure about Davide. I’ll check with him on Monday. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D54059#1286293, @teemperor wrote: > Minor detail: The revision title only mentions Java, but this revision > removes both Go and Java. > > Did anyone actually went through with Jim's proposal and posted this proposal > to some Go mailing list or so? https://reviews.llvm.org/D54059 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
