There’s actually been a slow push away from cl::opt. It’s less flexible and doesn’t support some things that the TableGen approach does. Recently there’s been a few efforts to port existing tools onto TableGen options from cl::opt.
I don’t think cl::opt is going away anytime soon so if it works I don’t have a strong opinion, but it’s kinda nice to standardize on “the one true method” if that’s the direction things are heading anyway On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:51 AM Greg Clayton via Phabricator < revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote: > clayborg added a comment. > > Would be great to see old and new output like Zach suggested. Is there a > reason we need to use TableGen? Other command line tools just use > llvm:🆑:opt stuff. Seems a bit obtuse to use TableGen? > > > Repository: > rLLDB LLDB > > CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION > https://reviews.llvm.org/D54692/new/ > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D54692 > > > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
