labath added a comment. In D54914#1311492 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D54914#1311492>, @zturner wrote:
> I think it would be good to use the way dotest works as a starting point. > You can specify --arch, and then you can run the test on multiple arches this > way by running dotest several times in succession, each with different arch > flags. > > I think a --triple option could be useful in limited scenarios, but I think > that most of the use cases will not need it. Most tests will probably want > to specify nothing at all and let the lit configuration pass the correct > information through. Actually, I think this is the same with the --arch flag > though. Because as soon as you specify something, then it limits the ability > of the test to run over and over with different parameters. I am not sure about their relative ratio, but yes, I agree that we have (or want to have) two kinds of tests. One would specify the target and the other would not. > Perhaps we could support *both* a --triple and a --arch flag. Maybe we can > make the script error if they're both specified. This would give each test > the capability to be written in the simplest way possible. Yes, I suppose that would work CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D54914/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D54914 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
