sgraenitz added a comment. Sorry for editing this again, but D55328 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D55328> brought up an important change request (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D55328#anchor-1322655) and I only realized this side-effect afterwards: adding LLDB to a LLVM build tree (all with default configurations), would have caused all binaries to be signed with the lldb_codesign identity. This is clearly not intended. The modified summary now outlines the identity handling in more detail. @labath thanks for bringing up your concerns, I did the change here and will adjust the other review.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D55013/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D55013 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
