zturner added a comment.

In D58654#1411084 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58654#1411084>, @labath wrote:

> BTW, what's the reason that you have to have this split now? I understand its 
> attractiveness from a Zen perspective, but it seems to me that at the end of 
> the day, it doesn't have that much impact on the new code you're about to 
> write. It seems to me you could still enforce a clean layering on the new 
> code by just saying "only ever include stuff from Host or Utility". The fact 
> that Host transitively pulls in the kitchen sink is unfortunate, but I don't 
> think it should impact you much. And when we finally clean up Host (which is 
> something that we'll do eventually, and I hope not too far from now), then 
> the new code will magically stop depending on the whole world without any 
> extra effort.


I suppose that actually is fine.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D58654/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D58654



_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to