mstorsjo added a comment. In D69502#1725146 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69502#1725146>, @labath wrote:
> In D69502#1723715 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69502#1723715>, @mstorsjo wrote: > > > In D69502#1723549 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69502#1723549>, @labath wrote: > > > > > Any way to get a test for this? Maybe creating a object file with a bogus > > > unwind RVA via yaml2obj ? > > > > > > Do we have a suitable test as basis for it? I'm not quite sure which way is > > the most compact way of achieving that. A small couple function exe with > > SEH or dwarf (eh_frame) unwind info, without debug info, with a crash/int3 > > in a nested function? Or just some image unwind commands so it doesn't need > > executing? > > > We have some files that might be usable as a basis for this, but I don't know > which one would be the best, as I don't know what you need here. What do you > need to do in order to reproduce the crash? Would it be possible to just set > the export table RVA to some bogus value? That should be trigerred by just > constructing the module symbol table... Ok, I'll look at it later to see if I can make some broken file to trigger this condition. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69502/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69502 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
