mstorsjo added a comment.
Yes, this definitely is a race condition. Without any changes, I triggered this
condition on arm64, but not on x86_64.
The issue is in the subclass ProcessWindows, where OnExitProcess does this:
void ProcessWindows::OnDebuggerError(const Status &error, uint32_t type) {
// [simplified]
if (m_session_data->m_initial_stop_received) {
} else {
// If we haven't actually launched the process yet, this was an error
// launching the process. Set the internal error and signal the initial
// stop event so that the DoLaunch method wakes up and returns a failure.
m_session_data->m_launch_error = error;
::SetEvent(m_session_data->m_initial_stop_event);
return;
}
}
void ProcessWindows::OnExitProcess(uint32_t exit_code) {
// [irrelevant bits excluded]
// If the process exits before any initial stop then notify the debugger
// of the error otherwise WaitForDebuggerConnection() will be blocked.
// An example of this issue is when a process fails to load a dependent DLL.
if (m_session_data && !m_session_data->m_initial_stop_received) {
Status error(exit_code, eErrorTypeWin32);
OnDebuggerError(error, 0);
}
// Reset the session.
m_session_data.reset();
}
So `ProcessWindows::OnExitProcess` signals to
`ProcessDebugger::WaitForDebuggerConnection` to proceed, and then
`ProcessWindows::OnExitProcess` resets `m_session_data`, which
`WaitForDebuggerConnection` starts inspecting.
What's the correct course of action here? Remove the `m_session_data.reset()`
from ProcessWindows::OnExitProcess, concluding that it's up to some other class
to clear `m_session_data` in this case?
Repository:
rLLDB LLDB
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69503/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69503
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
