labath added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/test/Shell/Watchpoint/Inputs/thread-dbreg.c:1-23
+#include <pthread.h>
+
+int g_watchme = 0;
+
+void *thread_func(void *arg) {
+ /* watchpoint trigger from subthread */
+ g_watchme = 2;
----------------
mgorny wrote:
> labath wrote:
> > Maybe simplify this and remove the threads and stuff?
> Threads are intentional since new thread handler copies dbregs per the other
> patch. This makes sure that new thread handler will not crash when it is
> unable to set dbregs.
Hang on, isn't this test about what happens when you *cannot* set watchpoints?
In that case there should be nothing to copy the dbregs from, right?
================
Comment at: lldb/test/Shell/Watchpoint/netbsd-nouserdbregs.test:5
+# REQUIRES: native && system-netbsd && (target-x86 || target-x86_64) &&
!dbregs-set
+# RUN: %clang %p/Inputs/thread-dbreg.c -pthread -g -o %t.out
+# RUN: %lldb -b -o 'settings set interpreter.stop-command-source-on-error
false' -s %s %t.out 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
----------------
mgorny wrote:
> labath wrote:
> > You should use %clang_host now. Are you sure that this even works on
> > current master?
> I have to admit that I'm at ~Oct 31 in my checkout. I've tried using
> `%clang_host` but it failed with `fg` saying that there is no job control.
%clang_host was added *on* Oct 31, so maybe you need to sync a bit further... :)
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D70050/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D70050
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
