rupprecht added a comment. In D71150#1774575 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71150#1774575>, @labath wrote:
> Hmm... given the lua thread on lldb-dev, maybe we should slow down here, and > consider the potential relationship of these tests and the hypothetical lua > tests that come to be. One of the reasons the current tests are so deeply > nested was that Zach was trying to future-proof ourselves for addition of new > scripting languages (at that time, Java was being floated around, but the > idea never took off the ground). I'd hate to move these tests now, only to > have to move them around again in a couple of weeks to make room for lua... I don't *think* this patch is affected by that discussion, except for the speculative comment to update `lldb_test_root = os.path.join(lldb_root, "test", "API", "test")` with the next patch. I'll followup with the next patch discussion. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71150/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71150 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
