labath accepted this revision. labath added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
This doesn't sound too bad. I am not sure if "nop" is a valid opcode on all targets, but if it isn't we could try hiding it in a macro, or replace it with an increment of a volatile/atomic variable or a call to a noinline function (the latter would probably require changes in test expectations. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D76406/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D76406 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
