shafik added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFASTParserClang.cpp:2671
// If we have a gap between the last_field_end and the current
// field we have an unnamed bit-field
if (this_field_info.bit_offset != last_field_end &&
----------------
aprantl wrote:
> do we need to amend the comment to describe the new conditions?
Good catch, I forgot about that.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/SymbolFile/DWARF/DWARFASTParserClang.cpp:2674
+ !(this_field_info.bit_offset < last_field_end) &&
+ !(last_field_info.bit_offset == 0 &&
+ last_field_info.bit_size == 0 &&
----------------
aprantl wrote:
> ```
> (last_field_info.bit_offset > 0) ||
> (last_field_info.bit_size > 0) ||
> !layout_info.base_offsets.size())
> ```
>
> Does this get more readable if you sink the ! into the subexpressions?
I see what your doing but it feels too clever, I would never get what it means
coming back to it a couple of months from now.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76808/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76808
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
