dblaikie added a comment. If I had to guess what this might've related to is the fact that LLVM puts a DW_AT_low_pc on the CU even if the CU uses discontiguous ranges - and in that case the low_pc has the constant value 0. So that all address values are resolved "relative" to that zero, making them absolute. There's some support in the DWARF spec for this being a right/good thing.
It's /possible/ that at some point LLVM didn't emit CU level address range info (it's redundant with aranges after all - though these days we err on the other direction of skipping aranges and just emitting CU ranges) - and just emitted the zero low_pc which might've been confusing? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D78489/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D78489 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
