shafik added a comment. In D80308#2051624 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D80308#2051624>, @aprantl wrote:
> > It seems C++17 and so on isn't yet in any of the language enums (and the > > DWARF standard it seems), so C++17 support will be a follow up patch. > > Yes and that may point to a problem with this approach. IIRC, there is — on > purpose — no C++17 language constant because the committee didn't see the > need to differentiate it in DWARF, since all features were additive and could > be described through specific C++17-related attributes. That is also problematic b/c you can still compile in C++17 mode but not use any C++17 specific constructs and yet expect LLDB to act as-if. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D80308/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D80308 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
