fallkrum added a comment. In D80112#2081008 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D80112#2081008>, @jingham wrote:
> Humm... So you'll have to test the continue behavior instead, which after > all was your original issue. That shouldn't be too hard, however. Just make > a breakpoint action that calls "thread suspend" on its thread and returns > false for should_stop the first time it is called, and just returns true > every time thereafter. Then the program should stop at the second hit of the > breakpoint rather than continuing to the exit. Jim, can you please read summary especially expected result and actual result part once again and tell if everything is clear? Really I can’t get a clue why you asking me to write a test with a program stopping at the second hit when the problem itself was in that it stopped at the second hit when in reality should not because I returned false. If I do the test you suggest (I mean returning true in action the second time and after) debugger will pass it even without applying this patch. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D80112/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D80112 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
