rupprecht added a comment.

In D87333#2262241 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87333#2262241>, @clayborg wrote:

> In D87333#2262236 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87333#2262236>, @rupprecht wrote:
>
>> In D87333#2262229 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D87333#2262229>, @clayborg wrote:
>>
>>> FYI: we switched away from "localhost" a long time ago due to issues with 
>>> people having a "localhost" entry in their /etc/hosts folder.
>>
>> I assume you mean people *not* having a "localhost" entry?
>
> I believe the issue was with people having a modified version that replaces 
> localhost with some other IP address.
>
>> I didn't even realize that was an option. Yes, this patch would break that. 
>> I'll have to take another approach, then.
>
> You might check the "git log" on any files that have "127.0.0.1" in them for 
> details.
>
>> Do you happen to have any references (bugs etc.) for those kinds of issues?

Looks like rLLDB202424 <https://reviews.llvm.org/rLLDB202424> is the patch that 
did most of this. There may be more context in rdar://problem/16154630 but I 
don't have access to that.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D87333/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D87333

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to