labath accepted this revision. labath added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Yes, looks good. It might not be unreasonable to add asserts to these functions too, as I don't think we should ever have a register that doesn't belong to any register set. ================ Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/Process/NetBSD/NativeRegisterContextNetBSD_x86_64.cpp:408-431 + else if (reg_num >= k_first_fpr_i386 && reg_num <= k_last_fpr_i386) return FPRegSet; - else if (reg_num <= k_last_avx_i386) + else if (reg_num >= k_first_avx_i386 && reg_num <= k_last_avx_i386) return XStateRegSet; // AVX - else if (reg_num <= lldb_dr7_i386) + else if (reg_num >= k_first_mpxr_i386 && reg_num <= k_last_mpxr_i386) + return -1; // MPXR + else if (reg_num >= k_first_mpxr_i386 && reg_num <= k_last_mpxc_i386) ---------------- Could you also remove all of these else's while you're in there, as per <http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#don-t-use-else-after-a-return>. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D88682/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D88682 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits