werat added a comment. In D92643#2434050 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D92643#2434050>, @jingham wrote:
> I couldn't tell what you meant by this... I would expect that a Type would > tell you that static members exist, and their type, etc. But I wouldn't > expect a Type to be able to get a value for a static member. After all, the > type comes from some Module, which could be shared amongst a bunch of > processes in lldb. The actual member value could be different in each of > these processes, but since the Type has no process, it has no way to get the > correct value. Yeah, of course you can't get a value for a static member just from the type (although, if it's an `inline static` then it could be possible?). But something like `VariableList EnumerateStaticMembers(Target, Type)` would be nice. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D92643/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D92643 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
