augusto2112 added inline comments.
Herald added a subscriber: JDevlieghere.
================
Comment at:
lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS.cpp:372
+ name_with_slash_stream.Format("/{0}", process_name);
+ auto name_with_slash = name_with_slash_stream.GetString();
+
----------------
Is there an easier way to format a StringRef such that if I have a StringRef
"foo" I get a new StringRef "/foo"?
================
Comment at:
lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS.cpp:377
+ // by the desired name.
+ auto should_exclude_process = [&exclusion_list, &process_name,
+ &name_with_slash](
----------------
There was an oversight on my last patch, where we could attach to a different
process if it ended with the name of the process we want to attach to. For
example if we want to attach to "bar", it could also attach to "foobar". I
changed it so we exclude processes whose names aren't a perfect match ("bar")
or end with a slash + process name ("path/to/bar"). Is this enough, or could
there be other false positives?
================
Comment at:
lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS.cpp:3314
+GDBRemoteCommunication::PacketResult
+GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS::Handle_vAttachOrWait(
+ StringExtractorGDBRemote &packet) {
----------------
`Handle_vAttachOrWait` and `Handle_vAttachWait` are pretty much the same. The
only differences are the argument we pass to `packet.SetFilePos` and to
`AttachWaitProcess`. Since they're so small I decided to keep them as separate
functions, but I could make one common function for both.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D94672/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D94672
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
