labath added a comment. In D95712#2566203 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95712#2566203>, @JDevlieghere wrote:
> In D95712#2563091 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95712#2563091>, @labath wrote: > >> Unfortunately I don't have the bandwidth to review this, though I feel that >> this should have a wider discussion, given that its destined to become a >> pretty big chunk of our public immutable api surface. > > When @mib and I discussed this offline, the idea was to start with an > interface that matches the C++ class and iterate on it as we gain more > experience through different use cases. Initially those uses cases consist of > core file debugging with a scripted process and using it to write tests for > things that have historically hard to test (@jasonmolenda has a better idea > of what these are). Long term the scriptable process plugin would be like the > OS plugins on steroids and would probably superseed them. I expect the XNU > people (who are currently the main users of the OS plugins) to have valuable > input on the interface as well. Until then the interface shouldn't be > considered stable. > > @mib Can you please add a disclaimed to the base class saying that the > interface is subject to change? Making the api flexible alleviates a lot of my concerns. Thanks. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D95712/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D95712 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
